Turkish Archer Kills 43 Men

Traditional archery, historical thrown, launched and shot arms, from hand-held to siege! Ancient to c.1900.
Open to public view.

Postby Alina » 26 Sep 2006 20:30

Patrick Williams wrote:
Alina wrote:No no no no no. The story says the archer is a Turk. It does not say what the bandits are. I was not saying the Turk was an Iraqi, I was saying the bandits were likely Iraqi as the person who supposedly witnessed this happen lived in Iraq. Jeez...it's not that complicated.


Ah, I stand (partially) corrected. The story does, however, say that the bandits are 'bandits'. I think my Greek neighbors will concur that bandit is a synonym for Turk.


Psh. The only bandits are the Greeks, stealing the western provinces of the Ottoman empire like they did - even attempting to capture Istanbul itself, before being soundly defeated. Bloody Greeks.
So men who are free
Love the old yew tree
And the land where the yew tree grows.
User avatar
Alina
Concubine
 
Posts: 10047
Joined: 16 Mar 2006 15:03
Location: Paleolithic

Postby Patrick Williams » 26 Sep 2006 21:54

Filthy Turks.
There's no bastard like a rat bastard!

+Patrick Williams, 32, K.T., R.O.S.
User avatar
Patrick Williams
General
 
Posts: 3364
Joined: 16 May 2006 01:47

Postby admin » 27 Sep 2006 09:52

Bah, the British settled the matter.

What a shame we don't still have the ancient religions in Europe and the Middle East. The religions of the Book really screwed things up, nah?
http://www.antique-swords.co.uk/

I like swords more than you.
User avatar
admin
Emperor
 
Posts: 35628
Joined: 13 Mar 2006 16:28
Location: Guildford, Surrey, England.

Postby Fab » 27 Sep 2006 10:55

Agreed.
User avatar
Fab
Field Marshal
 
Posts: 8370
Joined: 14 Mar 2006 13:54
Location: Under the Hat of Awesomeness.

Postby admin » 27 Sep 2006 11:37

Oh, and I forgot to mention that Paul got totally owned, yay! :lol:
http://www.antique-swords.co.uk/

I like swords more than you.
User avatar
admin
Emperor
 
Posts: 35628
Joined: 13 Mar 2006 16:28
Location: Guildford, Surrey, England.

Postby Fab » 27 Sep 2006 11:39

Pauwlned ?
User avatar
Fab
Field Marshal
 
Posts: 8370
Joined: 14 Mar 2006 13:54
Location: Under the Hat of Awesomeness.

Postby Alina » 27 Sep 2006 15:35

admin wrote:Oh, and I forgot to mention that Paul got totally owned, yay! :lol:


You're welcome.
So men who are free
Love the old yew tree
And the land where the yew tree grows.
User avatar
Alina
Concubine
 
Posts: 10047
Joined: 16 Mar 2006 15:03
Location: Paleolithic

Postby admin » 27 Sep 2006 16:00

And I note that he hasn't even had the nuts to show his face here today! :twisted:
http://www.antique-swords.co.uk/

I like swords more than you.
User avatar
admin
Emperor
 
Posts: 35628
Joined: 13 Mar 2006 16:28
Location: Guildford, Surrey, England.

Postby Paul » 29 Sep 2006 13:37

Alina wrote:However, I feel the need to correct Paul. When you say the traditional Turkish harem was a place of the household forbidden to male strangers, you're kind of wrong. The tradition of the harem comes from the Arabs, and from Islam. The Turks were not originally Islamic. Therefore, traditionally, Turkic peoples had no Harems. Furthermore, women in traditional nomadic societies, including Turkic ones, had considerably more freedom than most other pre-20th century women. Though, of course, there was a load of sexism too. One of the traditional Turkish practices was to feed guests, give them something to drink, give them a place to stay, and give them a woman to have sex with of the guest's own choosing. So, if you take the word harem, in the original meaning - it means forbidden. But, it also means sacred. So, if you choose it to mean something sacred, then certainly hospitality qualifies as sacred. As such, giving women to male guests for sexual purposes is hospitable, and by extension, also sacred. So a traditional Turkish harem involves pimping out your close female associates to strange men who come and visit your tent.

Thanks. I knew something was wrong with those bloody Turks. :wink:

admin wrote:Bah, the British settled the matter.
Ehm, not really I think... :roll:

admin wrote:What a shame we don't still have the ancient religions in Europe and the Middle East. The religions of the Book really screwed things up, nah?
I agree it's somewhat a pity that we can't hang the corpes of our enemies on trees anymore, but the Middle Eastern polytheistic religions were beyond perverted.
The Dutch now have a better navy than us. - an unnamed senior officer in the Royal (UK) Navy, January 2007
User avatar
Paul
Field Marshal
 
Posts: 4767
Joined: 16 Mar 2006 08:05
Location: Below sea level, again.

Postby Paul » 29 Sep 2006 13:39

admin wrote:And I note that he hasn't even had the nuts to show his face here today! :twisted:
Pfft. Given the fact that we crossposted, I'd think that you might as well check who's online before you pwn yourself, n00b!
The Dutch now have a better navy than us. - an unnamed senior officer in the Royal (UK) Navy, January 2007
User avatar
Paul
Field Marshal
 
Posts: 4767
Joined: 16 Mar 2006 08:05
Location: Below sea level, again.

Postby admin » 29 Sep 2006 16:07

Paul wrote:
admin wrote:And I note that he hasn't even had the nuts to show his face here today! :twisted:
Pfft. Given the fact that we crossposted, I'd think that you might as well check who's online before you pwn yourself, n00b!


I wrote that 2 days ago... Have you just made yourself look like a total idiot Paul? :lol:
http://www.antique-swords.co.uk/

I like swords more than you.
User avatar
admin
Emperor
 
Posts: 35628
Joined: 13 Mar 2006 16:28
Location: Guildford, Surrey, England.

Postby Alina » 29 Sep 2006 16:28

admin wrote:
Paul wrote:
admin wrote:And I note that he hasn't even had the nuts to show his face here today! :twisted:
Pfft. Given the fact that we crossposted, I'd think that you might as well check who's online before you pwn yourself, n00b!


I wrote that 2 days ago... Have you just made yourself look like a total idiot Paul? :lol:


Survey says: YES!
User avatar
Alina
Concubine
 
Posts: 10047
Joined: 16 Mar 2006 15:03
Location: Paleolithic

Postby Paul » 30 Sep 2006 14:28

admin wrote:
Paul wrote:
admin wrote:And I note that he hasn't even had the nuts to show his face here today! :twisted:
Pfft. Given the fact that we crossposted, I'd think that you might as well check who's online before you pwn yourself, n00b!


I wrote that 2 days ago... Have you just made yourself look like a total idiot Paul? :lol:


Meh, you just changed the dates with your admin powers... :wink:

Your post wasn't there when I made mine. Or at least, that was what I thought... :roll:

In case that you did not change the dates, then, yes, I suppose that could count as self-ownage...
The Dutch now have a better navy than us. - an unnamed senior officer in the Royal (UK) Navy, January 2007
User avatar
Paul
Field Marshal
 
Posts: 4767
Joined: 16 Mar 2006 08:05
Location: Below sea level, again.

Postby admin » 30 Sep 2006 18:55

I'm afraid that my admin-fu does not extend to changing post dates... You also credit me with a degree of giving-a-damn which I do not posess... You really think that I would go to such effort to own someone who is perfectly capable at self-ownage? :lol:
http://www.antique-swords.co.uk/

I like swords more than you.
User avatar
admin
Emperor
 
Posts: 35628
Joined: 13 Mar 2006 16:28
Location: Guildford, Surrey, England.

Postby Paul » 30 Sep 2006 18:59

Thank you for showing confidence in my abilities. I take that as a huge personal compliment. 8)
The Dutch now have a better navy than us. - an unnamed senior officer in the Royal (UK) Navy, January 2007
User avatar
Paul
Field Marshal
 
Posts: 4767
Joined: 16 Mar 2006 08:05
Location: Below sea level, again.

Previous

Return to Historical Missile Martial Arts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest