Anyone ever train ONLY HEMA or WMA?

The practice of martial arts, research, interpretation and modern equipment. Ancient to c.1900.
Open to public view.

Anyone ever train ONLY HEMA or WMA?

Postby Killrover » 25 Nov 2011 16:38

I am very new to practicing HEMA and really enjoy it, after many years of practicing nothing - a little Tai Chi once, a few martial arts demos, but generally nothing - there was nothing around my small town. I think that the WMA are on par with martial arts of the east and other areas and hope for the day when every major city has a HEMA studio, offering anyone choices in training and especially, cross-training.

A lot of instructors note how they started in eastern (EMA) and had to work hard to find WMA to train in. I was wondering if anyone has been able to train only in WMA all their life. If I wanted to be the best all-around artist possible, it would be silly to not cross-train; but since my interest is more historical and educational in nature, I am hoping to continue in WMA only. This is in no way anti-EMA; a good friend is a Kung Fu teacher with a very open door, and another sword instructor has popped up with an offer of kendo in my area that I was considering. However, I was hoping that if I have any success in swordplay, I would be able to say 'see, the HEMA schools are equal to the EMA schools'. (I think it can get kids interested in their ancient cultures if they get to do the 'fun things' like HEMA instead of just folk dances, costumes, etc)

So, anyone out there a 'gold star' HEMA practitioner?
Killrover
Cadet
 
Posts: 2
Joined: 25 Nov 2011 05:04

Re: Anyone ever train ONLY HEMA or WMA?

Postby Abomination » 25 Nov 2011 16:47

Oh there are loads.

People tend to come in via several routes of which EMA is only one. Lots come in via Olympic fencing, Which may or may not be a martial art, but it's certainly western. Others come via re-enctment or LARP which definatly aren't. others do come along just because they fancy swordfighting because they've read some fantasy novels, played warhammer or happen to be goths.
The Abomination is dead. Long live the Abomination.
Image

http://www.londonswordanddaggerclub.co.uk/
User avatar
Abomination
Field Marshal
 
Posts: 6049
Joined: 15 Mar 2006 11:19
Location: Back in his freaky arse castle in the himalayas

Re: Anyone ever train ONLY HEMA or WMA?

Postby admin » 25 Nov 2011 17:00

As Nigel says, yes there are lots of experienced people in HEMA who never did anything else. Most of my current Free Scholars never did any martial art before joining Schola.
I suspect that it is a generational thing - I started HEMA in 1997, pretty much at the beginning of its rebirth in the UK. I had to do EMA and sport fencing before that, because there wasn't any HEMA available! As soon as I heard about HEMA I started it. If I had been able to then I would have started HEMA at the earliest age possible and stuck with it. I always wanted to do HEMA from as young as I can remember.
http://www.antique-swords.co.uk/

I like swords more than you.
User avatar
admin
Emperor
 
Posts: 35466
Joined: 13 Mar 2006 16:28
Location: Guildford, Surrey, England.

Re: Anyone ever train ONLY HEMA or WMA?

Postby Matt Galas » 25 Nov 2011 17:27

The best example I can give you is Kristine Konsmo, a woman who recently won the sword & buckler tournament at Swordfish 2011 against a field of mostly male competitors. She had 2 years of HEMA training, and has never had any other martial arts or sport fencing training. Her only other physical training was 12 years of ballet. By the way, the opponent she beat in the finals had over 15 years of Asian martial arts experience.

So, yes. No other background is required or necessary, assuming you get a competent instructor.

Regards,

- Matt
Matt Galas
Erbisoeul, Belgium

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Wer do leit / Der ist tot / Wer sich ruret / Der lebt noch
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Matt Galas
Sergeant
 
Posts: 135
Joined: 28 Jul 2008 19:55
Location: Erbisoeul, Belgium

Re: Anyone ever train ONLY HEMA or WMA?

Postby The Salmon Lord » 25 Nov 2011 17:37

I never did any other martial arts.

However I had a lifetime of playing footbal, rugby, cricket etc.

The most important thing is I think a backgrouond of doing regular physical excercise. Mainly as you will have experience of controlling your body.
President Black Boar, Cupar Original, HC
User avatar
The Salmon Lord
Brigadier
 
Posts: 1552
Joined: 17 Mar 2006 14:16
Location: Looking out over the Firth of Forth

Re: Anyone ever train ONLY HEMA or WMA?

Postby Fab » 25 Nov 2011 18:09

I never did any other Martial Arts.

And had no particular sportive background either. Quite the contrary. Always picked last when choosing teams, blah blah.
User avatar
Fab
Field Marshal
 
Posts: 8370
Joined: 14 Mar 2006 13:54
Location: Under the Hat of Awesomeness.

Re: Anyone ever train ONLY HEMA or WMA?

Postby kit » 25 Nov 2011 18:22

I've done a bunch of eastern stuff and enjoyed it, but I'm afraid that it's always been contaminated by my Silver (and sports fencing)
--kit
User avatar
kit
Staff Sergeant
 
Posts: 163
Joined: 14 Jul 2007 14:05

Re: Anyone ever train ONLY HEMA or WMA?

Postby Bulot » 25 Nov 2011 19:43

I did a few years of greco-roman wrestling as a kid (which is western, and not really a MA), other than that, only HEMA.
User avatar
Bulot
Captain
 
Posts: 679
Joined: 17 Dec 2007 13:15
Location: Montreal, QC, Canada

Re: Anyone ever train ONLY HEMA or WMA?

Postby Andreas Engström » 25 Nov 2011 20:27

Did judo as a kid, which has, I think, given me a slight advantage in understanding Ringen.

Also done some Bujinkan, which hasn't really helped my HEMA much apart from making me rather good at rolling and breakfalling.

Both activities of course also gives you a good amount of body awareness and control as well.

Since I started doing HEMA about seven years ago I've done nothing else. I don't feel a need for anything else. I think I would have done well in HEMA even if I hadn't done other MA before.

I'm not sure what type of cross-training you're after, but in our club you can train longsword, military sabre, sword and buckler, pugilism, wrestling and staff weapons (and if you do all these you have absolutely no spare time left at all). Especially the longsword, sabre and pugilism groups also have a substantial amount of pure strength and endurance training as a natural part of training.

There are loads of people in our club who never did any MA before, and quite a few who never did any sort of sport before.

-Andreas
User avatar
Andreas Engström
Brigadier
 
Posts: 1598
Joined: 22 Mar 2006 12:40
Location: Göteborg, Sweden

Re: Anyone ever train ONLY HEMA or WMA?

Postby Phil C » 25 Nov 2011 21:27

It can go the other way, I'd never have considered attending, let alone finding myself enjoying, a Jiujitsu class before I became interested in some of the later European martial arts (most notably French and English self-defence systems).
--Effete Snob--
"A smile and a stout stick will carry one through any difficulty"- Lord Baden-Powell
http://www.blackboarswordsmanship.co.uk/
http://www.blackboarswordsmanship.co.uk/symposium.html
http://www.lulu.com/spotlight/PhilCrawley
User avatar
Phil C
Lieutenant General
 
Posts: 2524
Joined: 03 Feb 2008 20:52
Location: Auld Reekie- Capital Village of Jockland

Re: Anyone ever train ONLY HEMA or WMA?

Postby Killrover » 26 Nov 2011 02:05

Awesome. Great to hear. And I looked up Ms. Konsmo's fight on youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k7bh9RHfOnI - she did awesome!
Killrover
Cadet
 
Posts: 2
Joined: 25 Nov 2011 05:04

Re: Anyone ever train ONLY HEMA or WMA?

Postby KeithFarrell » 26 Nov 2011 11:32

Sounds like there are a good number of people who found WMA first. I'm afraid I am a relative new-comer to WMA; 13 years of karate, interspersed with sports fencing and some archery, about seven years of historical re-enactment, and about three or four years of WMA. Because of all my previous martial arts experience I have been able to pick up and understand WMA very quickly and I think that everything acts as a complement to everything else. Even the sports fencing and archery: sports fencing is very useful as it develops some lightning fast reflexes and some excellent lunging, and archery develops tip control for a weapon that will hit a target a number of yards away! :D
-- Keith Farrell --
Corsair's Wares
Academy of Historical Arts
Triquetra Services (Scotland)
Charity registration number SC042086
User avatar
KeithFarrell
Major
 
Posts: 939
Joined: 18 May 2010 17:38
Location: Glasgow, Scotland

Re: Anyone ever train ONLY HEMA or WMA?

Postby fullplate » 26 Nov 2011 12:43

I came to WMA by way of EMA, primarily Goju-ryu karate, also Judo and Hapkido. I enjoyed these activities but during a trip to London in the 1990s, I saw the fight interpretations at the Tower of London and realised that there were people who knew how these weapons were used. I joined a group in Auckland that purported to teach "medieval combat" and was quite happy until realising that what we had learned was not the real deal.Have been reading, researching and trying ever since.
Phil
fullplate
Staff Sergeant
 
Posts: 210
Joined: 18 Apr 2010 08:41
Location: Wokingham, Berkshire

Re: Anyone ever train ONLY HEMA or WMA?

Postby Thearos » 29 Nov 2011 21:42

Two thoughts, even though I will probably get jumped for expressing them:

1. In HEMA, is the emphasis on "Historical" or "Martial Arts" ? I.e. do you practise it because of interest in the past (be it the C14th or the C19th), or because of a desire to learn a fighting art (for whatever reason: fitness, exercise, self-defence, self-confidence, discipline, stress-management, recreational value of fighting without getting arrested as BD once wrote...).

2. Most HEMA streams are not living traditions-- there is no living continuous school of longsword, pollaxe, rapier, Ringen, pugilism; even the military sabre and the "canne" transformed into sporting forms (in the last century: there must have been British or German or French men alive in the 1950s who had learned how to fight with a sabre or sword, say the pre-1908 style British military swords, with a serious view to hand-to-hand combat). HEMA are reconstructed by scholarly research, and are young: 20 years at most ? First generation.

In contrast Eastern Martial arts are, for the main part, living traditions— even sportified or prettified or ossified...Likewise, BJJ or say Krav Maga are in their second or third generation and hence have tradition, transmission, and experience, that have streamlined practice and teaching and weeded out bad practice and improved the art.

So to practice (only) HEMA means something a bit different from eastern Martial arts-- it's experimental, historical, scholarly, bookish:

viewtopic.php?f=3&t=17759


The consequence seems to be that to practice HEMA must affect all the martial arts aspects (fitness, self-defence, etc): you can't just do it as you would learn judo or karate; you have no master or tradition to fall back on, but you're constantly innovating and trying to find out something lost. Is that fair ?
Thearos
Major
 
Posts: 925
Joined: 30 Apr 2011 09:16
Location: Oxford

Re: Anyone ever train ONLY HEMA or WMA?

Postby Carletto » 29 Nov 2011 22:07

Karate, Aikido, Kenjutsu, I sucked at all of them as I do in Hema, it's my trademark.
"Carlo is madder than tits on a Piranha" steel bonnet, Mar 25, 2010

I perfectly know my opinion is biased, but I like it that way
User avatar
Carletto
Gentlegnome
 
Posts: 7804
Joined: 27 Feb 2007 20:28
Location: Italy

Re: Anyone ever train ONLY HEMA or WMA?

Postby Bulot » 29 Nov 2011 22:19

1. In HEMA, is the emphasis on "Historical" or "Martial Arts" ?


Both. That's the point.

2. Most HEMA streams are not living traditions


I'd go on a limp here, and say none of the HEMAs have a living tradition (or more precisely, has'nt needed some kind of reconstruction, at one point). That's what makes them "historical". That and the source, of course.
User avatar
Bulot
Captain
 
Posts: 679
Joined: 17 Dec 2007 13:15
Location: Montreal, QC, Canada

Re: Anyone ever train ONLY HEMA or WMA?

Postby Thearos » 30 Nov 2011 16:43

is HEMA a form of experimental archaeology ?
Thearos
Major
 
Posts: 925
Joined: 30 Apr 2011 09:16
Location: Oxford

Re: Anyone ever train ONLY HEMA or WMA?

Postby Motley » 30 Nov 2011 16:47

Thearos wrote:is HEMA a form of experimental archaeology ?


If you are an experimental archaeologist, I guess so. It would be a bit silly for me, a random guy, to claim I was doing experimental archaeology.

May be amateur practical archaeology would be a more appropriate term :-)
Dan Sellars
Context is everything
User avatar
Motley
Lieutenant General
 
Posts: 2579
Joined: 20 Jan 2008 16:04
Location: Great White North

Re: Anyone ever train ONLY HEMA or WMA?

Postby Marc » 30 Nov 2011 19:35

I started learning Ledall in June/July. It is my first and only combat art. I have never done re-enactment either. The only sports I was involved in were golf, badminton and running but that was all back when I was at school.
Generic Dragon's Tayle nutjob
Marc
Private
 
Posts: 26
Joined: 21 Nov 2011 22:53

Re: Anyone ever train ONLY HEMA or WMA?

Postby Thearos » 01 Dec 2011 01:08

Motley wrote:
Thearos wrote:is HEMA a form of experimental archaeology ?


If you are an experimental archaeologist, I guess so. It would be a bit silly for me, a random guy, to claim I was doing experimental archaeology.

May be amateur practical archaeology would be a more appropriate term :-)


If what you do is reconstructing the past through physical experimentation based on sources and objects, and it generates knowledge, ideas and insight, that's practical experimental archaeology.
Thearos
Major
 
Posts: 925
Joined: 30 Apr 2011 09:16
Location: Oxford

Next

Return to General Martial Arts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest